The Federation of Indian Pilots (FIP) has formally served legal notices to The Wall Street Journal and Reuters, demanding retractions and public apologies for their coverage of the Air India Flight AI-171 crash. According to Hindustan Times, the step comes after FIP described their reporting as baseless and defamatory, stating that both outlets alleged the crash was due to deliberate pilot error—specifically, claims that the captain turned off both fuel control switches—without substantiation from the official Indian investigation report.
What the AAIB Preliminary Report Says
The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau of India, in its initial findings, stated that both fuel control switches on the Boeing 787 Dreamliner were moved from “Run” to “Cutoff” shortly after takeoff. Cockpit voice recorders indicated one pilot asked why fuel had been cut off, with the other denying responsibility. The AAIB report does not assign blame or specify that any pilot deliberately toggled the switches. The investigation is ongoing, and the bureau has cautioned against premature conclusions.
FIP’s Allegations Against WSJ and Reuters
The Federation of Indian Pilots is objecting to the WSJ’s and Reuters’ coverage, which cited unnamed American sources implying deliberate action by the captain as the cause of the crash. FIP argues these versions are speculative, contradict the official report, and damage the reputation of Indian pilots while undermining public trust in aviation safety. FIP president Captain CS Randhawa emphasized that nowhere in the Indian report is pilot error or intent assigned, and he warned that further action will be pursued if the reports are not rectified.
Industry and Regulatory Responses
Other pilot associations, such as the Airline Pilots’ Association of India, have echoed FIP’s calls for restraint and have warned about the damage speculative narratives can cause. The AAIB itself urged the media to avoid conjecture, urged respect for those lost in the accident, and reiterated that the investigation is still underway. The US National Transportation Safety Board, which is involved in the investigation, has also called the recent media reports premature and speculative, emphasizing that inquiries of this scale take time and should not be prejudged.
Wait for Final Investigation Results
This dispute highlights the sensitivities around reporting on aviation disasters. With a formal investigation still pending, aviation bodies and pilot unions are stressing the need for accurate, unbiased coverage, and are urging the public to wait for conclusive, official findings. The current situation also reflects a more assertive stance by Indian pilots and regulators as they seek to defend professional integrity and ensure facts, not speculation, shape public perception of air safety.
Photo Credit: HT
For more trending stories click here
Follow us for latest updates:
